BrightRate-LM

Representation-Aware Quality Assessment for User-Generated HDR Video

Shreshth Saini, Yilin Wang, Neil Birkbeck, Balu Adsumilli, Alan C. Bovik

What this is

BrightRate-LM predicts the perceptual quality of user-generated HDR video and returns a score, a description of visible defects, and reasoning for the score. This work extends BrightRate (WACV 2026) by testing how multimodal language models respond to tone-mapped, multi-exposure, and native PQ inputs.

Key figures

Accuracy, memory, and throughput comparisons for selected models
BrightRate-LM gives the strongest measured accuracy among the selected models while retaining a 7B backbone.
SROCC change from SDR to multi-exposure input
Multi-exposure input improves four of five matched model and recipe pairs.
Zero-shot and supervised scaling across model families
Supervised quality prediction does not improve monotonically with model size.
Training loss curves for the studied model families
The matched recipes converge, but lower training loss does not guarantee better held-out ranking.
BrightRate-LM score, description, and reasoning example
The output interface pairs the numeric estimate with a short visual diagnosis.

Main result

BrightRate-LM values are five-split means. BrightRate values are published 100-split medians.

ModelInputSROCCPLCCKRCCRMSE
BrightRate-LM, 7BMulti-exposure0.90520.91070.72815.5348
BrightRate, publishedHDR-aware features0.88870.89700.70595.7514

Insights

Data

Experiments use BrightVQ from BrightRate.

BibTeX

@article{saini2026brightratelm,
  title   = {BrightRate-LM: Representation-Aware Quality Assessment for User-Generated HDR Video},
  author  = {Saini, Shreshth and Wang, Yilin and Birkbeck, Neil and Adsumilli, Balu and Bovik, Alan C.},
  journal = {Machine Vision and Applications},
  year    = {2026},
  note    = {Submitted}
}